About Me

Name: Damon J. Smith
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 
Pro-Choice v. Pro-Life

Do Mitt Romney's Religious Beliefs Disqualify Him?

A prominent news outlet has stated that John McCain is considering making Mitt Romney his Vice Presidential nominee. Considering all the scrutiny on Barack Obama's religious history, I think it's appropriate to discuss Mr. Romney's faith.


Mormons not only have a history of controversial views against blacks, but also questionable practices and beliefs that conflict with Jews and Christians. Can we justifiably criticize Reverend Wright and Obama's belief system without questioning Mitt Romney and his well known Mormon beliefs?

In the 1990's, Jewish groups vocally opposed the LDS' (Latter Day Saints, also known as Mormons) practice of baptism for the dead on behalf of Jewish victims of the Holocaust and Jews in general. According to LDS Church's general authority, Monte J. Brough, "Mormons baptized 380,000 Holocaust victims." Some might say they did this as an act of service and compassion - and perhaps that truly was their motivation.

But the more important point to make is that Mormons believe they can control a person's salvation.

To think that you're in control of someone's individual salvation goes against the very principle of Christianity. The bible is clear that each person's salvation should be sought after by oneself and one's individual belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.

Psalm 3:8 says, "Salvation belongeth unto the LORD: thy blessing is upon thy people." And in Acts 4:12, it states, "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved."

Romans 10:10 further clarifies the process of salvation, that confessing with your mouth and believing in your heart brings about salvation. "For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation."

Thank God that our salvation is found in Jesus Christ, because if man were in control at times he just might think you or I are WORTHY... or worse, UNWORTHY, according to his understanding.

In addition to the Book of Mormon, Mormons use other books as fundamental Mormon doctrine: Articles of Faith, Doctrine of Covenants, The Pearl of Great Price and the Journal of Discourses. The Articles of Faith are an informal creed composed by Joseph Smith, Jr. as part of an 1842 letter sent to John Wentworth, editor of the Chicago Democrat. It lists thirteen fundamental doctrines of Mormonism. The Pearl of Great Price, Journal of Discourses and Doctrine of Covenants are a collection of choice materials such as speeches, writings and sermons touching many significant aspects of the faith and doctrine used for teaching in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

Most LDS denominations view the Articles of Faith as the authority for their basic theology. Some denominations, such as The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, have adopted the articles as holy scripture. This is the denomination to which Mitt Romney belongs.

Mormons welcomed all people to Mormonism regardless of color. However, they excluded most people of black African descent from Priesthood ordination. These exclusionary practices continued until September 30, 1978. Ironically, this points to Mormonism as being a separatist and elitist religion.

See, the problem many people have with right wing conservative Christians is that they will claim Christianity only when it seems to apply. How does the fact that someone is Republican supersede their anti-Christian doctrine and beliefs? Shouldn't allegiance be to Christ before a political party? If Christians accept Mormonism as a Christian religion, then in fact we are accepting false doctrine and setting ourselves up for deception.

Some very racist ideas were taught as doctrine and enforced, such as a dark skinned Mormon could not hold the priesthood. Apostle Mark E. Petersen banned inter-marriage and enforced segregation. In The Journal of Discourses, vol. 10 p. 110, Brigham Young himself stated that inter-marriage would result in death on the spot as penalty, and that this "will always be so."

Brigham Young was very clear on this, saying, "Do you want me to tell you about God's view on the African Race? Should the white man, who belongs to the chosen family, mix his blood with Cain's family, then the penance of bud's law is death. It shall forever be so." (Journal of Discourses, Vol. 10 p. 110)

Despite historical abuses of scripture pertaining to slavery across Christianity, the bible clearly reveals how God feels about race. Consider how God responded to Miriam and Aaron when they spoke against Moses because he had married an Ethiopian woman. He scolded them harshly and struck Miriam with leprosy. (see Numbers 1)

If race is an issue with you, God has a problem with you. If blacks are not forgiving for slavery and past transgressions, God has a problem with them. This is what God says, not what Damon says.

In further writings, LDS describe dark skin as a curse and mark from God. The Book of Mormon, published in the late 1820's, states the following ab out a group of people who rebelled against God.

"And [God] had caused the cursing to come upon them, yeah, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people, the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them. And thus saith the Lord God; I will cause that they shall be loathsome unto thy people, save they shall repent of their iniquities." (2 Nephi 5:21, emphasis added)

For readers who may be unfamiliar with the Holy Bible, I want to make it clear that the above text is NOT from the Holy Bible, but rather from the Book of Mormon. There is no book of Nephi in the Holy Bible.

On February 6, 1835, a prominent leader of the Mormons, W.W. Phelps, wrote a letter theorizing that the curse of Cain survived the deluge by passing through the wife of Ham, son of Noah, who according to Phelps was a descendant of Cain (Messenger and Advocate 1:82). In addition, Phelps introduced the idea of a third curse upon Ham himself for "marrying a black wife". (Id.) This black wife, according to Phelps, was not just a descendant of Cain, but one of the pre-flood "people of Canaan" (not directly related to the Biblical Canaanites after the flood).

There is no way we can accept Mitt Romney as a vice-presidential candidate without scrutinizing his belief system. In all fairness, we should evaluate his Mormon beliefs with the same fervor that some scrutinized Barack Obama's, whose beliefs were under fire simply due to his association with one controversial pastor. If the same standards are applied, should Mitt Romney's beliefs disqualify him for the position of Vice President?

Mormonism contradicts with Judaism, Christianity and the Constitutional principles that our nation was built upon. The bible tells us that God is not a respecter of persons - he does not put one before another. But we will be judged on our belief system, or more specifically our belief in Jesus Christ as the author and finisher and source of our salvation.

Until next Saturday, this is Damon J. Smith. Please email me at damon@damonjsmith.com and visit www.DamonJSmith.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Do Mitt Romney's Religious Beliefs Disqualify Him?

A prominent news outlet has stated that John McCain is considering making Mitt Romney his Vice Presidential nominee.  Considering all the scrutiny on Barack Obama's religious history, I think it's appropriate to discuss Mr. Romney's faith.


Mormons not only have a history of controversial views against blacks, but also questionable practices and beliefs that conflict with Jews and Christians.  Can we justifiably criticize Reverend Wright and Obama's belief system without questioning Mitt Romney and his well known Mormon beliefs?

In the 1990's, Jewish groups vocally opposed the LDS' (Latter Day Saints, also known as Mormons) practice of baptism for the dead on behalf of Jewish victims of the Holocaust and Jews in general.  According to LDS Church's general authority, Monte J. Brough, "Mormons baptized 380,000 Holocaust victims."  Some might say they did this as an act of service and compassion - and perhaps that truly was their motivation.  

But the more important point to make is that Mormons believe they can control a person's salvation.

To think that you're in control of someone's individual salvation goes against the very principle of Christianity.  The bible is clear that each person's salvation should be sought after by oneself and one's individual belief in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.

Psalm 3:8 says, "Salvation belongeth unto the LORD: thy blessing is upon thy people."  And in Acts 4:12, it states, "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved."

Romans 10:10 further clarifies the process of salvation, that confessing with your mouth and believing in your heart brings about salvation.  "For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation."

Thank God that our salvation is found in Jesus Christ, because if man were in control at times he just might think you or I are WORTHY... or worse, UNWORTHY, according to his understanding.

In addition to the Book of Mormon, Mormons use other books as fundamental Mormon doctrine:  Articles of Faith, Doctrine of Covenants, The Pearl of Great Price and the Journal of Disclosures.  The Articles of Faith are an informal creed composed by Joseph Smith, Jr. as part of an 1842 letter sent to John Wentworth, editor of the Chicago Democrat.  It lists thirteen fundamental doctrines of Mormonism.  The Pearl of Great Price, Journal of Disclosures and Doctrine of Covenants are a collection of choice materials such as speeches, writings and sermons touching many significant aspects of the faith and doctrine used for teaching in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

Most LDS denominations view the Articles of Faith as the authority for their basic theology.  Some denominations, such as The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, have adopted the articles as holy scripture.  This is the denomination to which Mitt Romney belongs.  

Mormons welcomed all people to Mormonism regardless of color.  However, they excluded most people of black African descent from Priesthood ordination.  These exclusionary practices continued until September 30, 1978.  Ironically, this points to Mormonism as being a separatist and elitist religion.

See, the problem many people have with right wing conservative Christians is that they will claim Christianity only when it seems to apply.  How does the fact that someone is Republican supersede their anti-Christian doctrine and beliefs?  Shouldn't allegiance be to Christ before a political party?  I Christians accept Mormonism as a Christian religion, then in fact we are accepting false doctrine and setting ourselves up for deception.

Some very racist ideas were taught as doctrine and enforced, such as a dark skinned Mormon could not hold the priesthood.  Apostle Mark E. Petersen banned inter-marriage and enforced segregation.  In The Journal of Disclosures, vol. 10 p. 110, Brigham Young himself stated that inter-marriage would result in death on the spot as penalty, and that this "will always be so." 

Brigham Young was very clear on this, saying, "Do you want me to tell you about God's view on the African Race?  Should the white man, who belongs to the chosen family, mix his blood with Cain's family, then the penance of bud's law is death.  It shall forever be so."  (Journal of Disclosures, Vol. 10 p. 110)

Despite historical abuses of scripture pertaining to slavery across Christianity, the bible clearly reveals how God feels about race.  Consider how God responded to Miriam and Aaron when they spoke against Moses because he had married an Ethiopian woman.  He scolded them harshly and struck Miriam with leprosy.  (see Numbers 1)

If race is an issue with you, God has a problem with you.  If blacks are not forgiving for slavery and past transgressions, God has a problem with them.  This is what God says, not what Damon says.

In further writings, LDS describe dark skin as a curse and mark from God.  The Book of Mormon, published in the late 1820's, states the following ab out a group of people who rebelled against God.

"And [God] had caused the cursing to come upon them, yeah, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity.  For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people, the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them.  And thus saith the Lord God; I will cause that they shall be loathsome unto thy people, save they shall repent of their iniquities." (2 Nephi 5:21, emphasis added)

For readers who may be unfamiliar with the Holy Bible, I want to make it clear that the above text is NOT from the Holy Bible, but rather from the Book of Mormon.  There is no book of Nephi in the Holy Bible.

On February 6, 1835, a prominent leader of the Mormons, W.W. Phelps, wrote a letter theorizing that the curse of Cain survived the deluge by passing through the wife of Ham, son of Noah, who according to Phelps was a descendant of Cain (Messenger and Advocate 1:82).  In addition, Phelps introduced the idea of a third curse upon Ham himself for "marrying a black wife".  (Id.)  This black wife, according to Phelps, was not just a descendant of Cain, but one of the pre-flood "people of Canaan" (not directly related to the Biblical Canaanites after the flood).

There is no way we can accept Mitt Romney as a vice-presidential candidate without scrutinizing his belief system.  In all fairness, we should evaluate his Mormon beliefs with the same fervor that some scrutinized Barack Obama's, whose beliefs were under fire simply due to his association with one controversial pastor.  I think if the same standards are applied, we - especially Christian Conservatives - should determine Mitt Romney disqualified for the position of  Vice President.

Mormons have a clearly negative, even loathsome view of people of African descent.  Their belief system is downright elitist.  Mormonism contradicts with Judaism, Christianity and basic humanity.  The bible tells us that God is not a respecter of persons - he does not put one before another.  But we will be judged on our belief system, or more specifically our belief in Jesus Christ as the author and finisher and source of our salvation.

Until next Saturday, this is Damon J. Smith.  Please email me at damon@damonjsmith.com and visit www.DamonJSmith.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (11) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pro-Choice Culture

www.DamonJSmith.com

Once again, ESPN columnist Jemele Hill decided to write an over-simplified article with trite soapbox statements.

Ms. Hill wrote that Karl Malone has failed as a father and a man.  In addition, she suggested that Al Sharpton organize a protest outside of Karl Malone's house.  She went on to state that Roger Clemens' alleged sexual relationship with a 15 year old is nothing compared to what Malone has done.

Karl Malone grew up in Summerfield, Louisiana. Apparently, when he was 19 he had a sexual relationship with a minor who was 13 at the time.  The result of this relationship was the birth of a boy by the name of Demetrius Bell. Much to the perseverance and character of Mr. Bell, he became a great student and good basketball player, receiving a scholarship to Northwestern State.  Upon arriving, he was enticed to play football due to his size and athleticism (reminiscent of his father).  In 2005, he appeared in one game.  The next season was the beginning of 22 straight starts.  Bell became an All American, a first team All-Southland Conference selection, and now a proud NFL player expected to graduate this spring.

My first thought was, "wow!  Look what God can do!"  Demetrius' mother could have chosen from a number of options to avoid the responsibility of motherhood in her teenage years.  But she chose to assume that responsibility, and from that choice now her son is blessed with a measure of success at a young age. 

As I continued to read Ms. Hill's article I thought, "why not highlight Demetrius Bell instead of using this as an opportunity to tear down Malone?"

Reading further, my last thought was, "this is such a misguided, albeit relevant, article."

What are the details of this situation?  Was Malone in some way running from everything that he had known to be negative in his life?  That "everything" being Summerfield, which is high on poverty and low on success.  Was he running from the very thing that drove him to be one of the greatest power forwards ever?  One of the details that stands out is that once Malone made it into the NBA, he had the ability and/or resources to be a part of Demetrius Bell's life.  Was there something else going on here?  It had to be something deeper.

When I consider this story, so many unanswered questions, thoughts and emotions enter my mind.  What are we doing as a society to protect our families?  What makes a man desert his family?  What are we doing as men?  Is it a fear of responsibility?  Fear of financial bondage?  Fear of being controlled?  Difficulty to trust that the mother will act upon both the child and father's interests?  Fear of a legal system that seems to tear so many families apart?  Why would a man or woman walk out on his or her own child?

Is it really as simple as selfishness and a complete disregard for life?  These types of situations are rarely that simple, and many times even those involved never fully understand why they do what they do.  Perhaps that's why the temptation is so great for bystanders to weigh in with over-simplified judgments about the people involved.  

However, I would like to use this situation as an opportunity to focus more attention on the current laws and culture regarding parenting, adoption and abortion.  

Morally, it is wrong to neglect anyone, whether it's your child or not.  But as a person, it's your right to choose whether or not you want to be in someone's life.  Am I saying that Karl Malone was right?  No.  But he does have the right to choose and he has to live with his choice.

But consider the contradiction in our rules today.  If a woman gets pregnant and chooses not to have the child, she can abort, put the child up for adoption, or simply leave it at the hospital.  However, if a pregnant woman is assaulted, resulting in the loss of the baby, the assaulter can and will be charged with murder.  Furthermore, if a woman is pregnant and is murdered (remember the Laci Peterson case), the assaulter is charged with double murder - murder of both the mother and child. 

So why is it that abortion is legal?  In one situation it is murder and the other it is simply a "right to choose," without even identifying the baby as a child but rather as a fetus, possibly to remove all emotional ties from the child.  If you refer to it as a child rather than a fetus, it would force all involved to conclude that abortion is in fact murder.

However, if a man gets a woman pregnant and doesn't want to be a father, most often he is not given a choice.  If she chooses life, his choice will be to either suck it up and take responsibility for that moment of pleasure, or do what Karl Malone apparently did and run the risk of being chased down by a government entity and possibly publicly humiliated.  Lucky him, because the woman is left with possibly the most difficult decision she will ever make.

Why would a woman choose to abort?  What are we doing as a society, or more specifically as men, to leave a woman with that difficult choice?  What are we doing to leave a woman feeling so alone and frustrated that she ultimately chooses death over life?  There are plenty of advocates to help a woman choose death - but who will advocate for this new mother if she chooses life?  Who will be there for her when she feels as though she can't be a mother?  And who speaks for the baby - does the child have a voice?

I would assume that abortion is not a woman's first choice, nor her natural inclination.  Rather, it is a culture we have created in which women feel as though this is a viable, or perhaps the only, option.  It is a culture that no longer values the importance of children, mothering and, more significantly, fathering.  Having a child now represents loss of independence, financial burden, loss of youth, and many other negative concepts.  This is the culture our nation has created.  You can see it in the statistics, as 95% of all abortions are performed as a means of birth control.  Only 1% are performed because of rape.  1% are performed because of fetal abnormalities and 3% due to the mother's health problems.  So again, we are failing to reinforce alternate solutions.

Lord help us!  We are ALL HYPOCRITES... Oh, how we have failed our mothers.  Men, we are failing.

What would it take to provide adequate assistance for mothers to choose life without encouraging the mother and father to fight over finances, custody and other issues that ultimately divide the two most important people in a child's life?  When you consider the big business of lawyer fees, court fees and child support collections, you can see how the temptation to abort becomes so strong.  In reality, there is big money to be made in out-of-wedlock conceptions. Either by pushing abortions or by charging the non-custodial parent (typically fathers) for the governmental service of enforcing their parental duties.

So why would anyone want to fix this problem?  Is there any money to be made in reconciliation?  Would the long term benefits of encouraging marriage, teaching financial planning and perhaps providing relationship counseling outweigh the loss of revenue in the child support division?  Couldn't the Planned Parenthood employees and lobbyists cross over to encourage life and actually begin to help planning parenthood?

We can do better.  This "Pro-Choice" culture is simply not the solution.  We need more for our women and children.

Instead of focusing on Karl Malone's mistakes, we need to focus on our own.  We need to fix the contradictions in our legal system.  Maybe then we can send a message to fathers and mothers that there is no double standard - all will be held equally accountable for life and death.  And both will be equal participants without focusing on a dollar amount.

No, Karl Malone shouldn't get a free pass for running from his responsibility of parenting Demetrius Bell.  But neither should the 1.2 million women in 2007 who chose to abort their children, nor the men who helped father those 1.2 million fetuses that were aborted.

Lord help us.  We all have sinned and fallen short of your glory.  We must do better.

Thankfully the mother of Demetrius Bell had the courage to give him a chance at life.  Quite possibly we should be writing about her instead of Demetrius or Karl Malone.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »